تأثیر تغییرات اقلیمی بر نابرابری‌های اجتماعی: مروری بر روایت‌های اجتماعی، سیاستی و زیست‌محیطی

نوع مقاله : مقاله مروری

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه پیام نور تهران، ایران.

3 گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

تغییرات اقلیمی یکی از چالش‌های مهم و فراگیر قرن بیست‌و‌یکم است که نه‌تنها پیامدهای زیست‌محیطی، بلکه آثار اجتماعی و اقتصادی گسترده‌ای نیز به‌همراه دارد. این پدیده به‌ویژه گروه‌های آسیب‌پذیر مانند فقرا، اقلیت‌های قومی، زنان و ساکنان مناطق حاشیه‌ای را به‌طور نابرابر تحت تأثیر قرار می‌دهد. هدف این پژوهش، بررسی پیوند میان تغییرات اقلیمی و نابرابری‌های اجتماعی از منظر روایت‌های اجتماعی، سیاست‌گذاری و ابعاد زیست‌محیطی است. مقاله حاضر با رویکردی مروری و تحلیلی، به کمک منابع علمی بین‌المللی، گزارش‌های سازمان‌های جهانی و مطالعات موردی در حوزه عدالت اقلیمی، به تحلیل روایت‌ها، سیاست‌ها و پیامدهای اجتماعی این بحران پرداخته است. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهند که تغییرات اقلیمی اغلب به‌صورت ناعادلانه بر جوامع کم‌برخوردار اثر می‌گذارد. روایت‌های رسانه‌ای و اجتماعی نقش کلیدی در شکل‌دهی به افکار عمومی و جهت‌گیری سیاست‌ها دارند. با این حال، بسیاری از سیاست‌های اقلیمی موجود فاقد رویکرد عدالت‌محور بوده و ممکن است به بازتولید نابرابری‌ها منجر شوند. در این میان، سیاست‌های تطبیقی، انتقال عادلانه و مشارکت فعال جوامع محلی از جمله راه‌کارهای مؤثر برای کاهش شکاف‌های اجتماعی در مواجهه با بحران اقلیمی به‌شمار می‌روند. مقابله مؤثر با تغییرات اقلیمی مستلزم سیاست‌گذاری مبتنی‌بر عدالت اجتماعی، تلفیق داده‌های اقلیمی با شاخص‌های نابرابری، و تقویت روایت‌های عدالت‌محور در فضای اجتماعی است. چنین رویکردی می‌تواند زمینه‌ساز توسعه‌ای پایدار و افزایش تاب‌آوری جوامع در برابر بحران‌های آینده باشد. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Impact of Climate Change on Social Inequalities: A Review of Social, Policy, and Environmental Narratives

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Bagher Koopaii 1
  • Ayub Gravand 2
  • Hossein Souri 3
1 Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Faculty of Business Administration, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Department of Psychology, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract
Objective: Climate change is one of the most significant and pervasive challenges of the twenty-first century, encompassing not only environmental consequences but also extensive social and economic implications. This phenomenon disproportionately affects vulnerable groups—such as the poor, ethnic minorities, women, and residents of marginalized regions. This study aims to examine the interlinkages between climate change and social inequalities through the lenses of social narratives, policymaking, and environmental dimensions.
Method: Adopting a review-based and analytical approach, this paper draws upon international scholarly sources, reports from global organizations, and case studies within the field of climate justice to analyze the narratives, policies, and social consequences of this crisis.
Results: The findings indicate that climate change tends to have inequitable impacts on disadvantaged communities. Media and social narratives play a crucial role in shaping public opinion and guiding policy orientations. However, many existing climate policies lack a justice-oriented perspective and may inadvertently reproduce or exacerbate existing inequalities. In this context, adaptive policies, just transition strategies, and the active participation of local communities emerge as effective measures for mitigating social disparities in the face of the climate crisis.
Conclusion: Effective responses to climate change require policymaking grounded in social justice, the integration of climate data with inequality indicators, and the strengthening of justice-oriented narratives within the public sphere. Such an approach can pave the way for sustainable development and enhance community resilience in confronting future crises.
 
 
English Extended Abstract
Introduction
Climate change has emerged as one of the most urgent and multifaceted challenges of the twenty-first century, with far-reaching implications that extend beyond environmental degradation to encompass deeply rooted social and economic inequalities. Rising global temperatures, altered precipitation patterns, and the intensification of extreme weather events disproportionately impact marginalized and vulnerable populations, including low-income groups, women, ethnic minorities, and inhabitants of geographically fragile regions. These communities often contend with structural disadvantages—such as constrained access to resources, limited political representation, and systemic discrimination—that exacerbate their exposure and reduce their adaptive capacity to climate-induced risks. Consequently, climate change operates not only as an ecological crisis but also as a catalyst and amplifier of pre-existing social inequities. The growing recognition of the concept of climate justice highlights the imperative to scrutinize how the burdens and benefits of climate action are distributed and how dominant narratives, policy frameworks, and environmental discourses shape collective and institutional responses to this global challenge.
 
Method
This study employs a structured and analytical literature review approach to synthesize evidence from peer-reviewed journal articles, international organizational reports, and case studies across diverse geographical contexts. The review is inherently interdisciplinary, integrating theoretical perspectives from climate justice, political ecology, and structural inequality frameworks. The collected literature was examined through three primary analytical lenses:

Social Narratives – exploring how communities, media, and public discourse construct and frame the interconnections between climate change and social inequality.
Policy Narratives – assessing how national governments and international organizations conceptualize and operationalize climate policies, with particular attention to equity-oriented measures versus those that perpetuate systemic disparities.
Environmental Narratives – analyzing how ecological and geographical vulnerabilities intersect with structural inequalities to shape differentiated exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacities.

Methodologically, the review is both descriptive and evaluative in nature, aiming to identify recurring patterns of inequity, reveal gaps within current policy architectures, and map potential pathways toward socially just and inclusive climate action.
 
Results
The analysis presents several pivotal findings:
First, climate change persistently intensifies existing social and economic disparities. Marginalized groups—including urban poor populations, subsistence farmers, Indigenous communities, and women—are disproportionately exposed to climate hazards while possessing limited adaptive capacity. For instance, informal urban settlements often lack resilient infrastructure, rendering them highly vulnerable to flooding, heatwaves, and pollution-related health risks. Similarly, small-scale farmers dependent on natural resources face recurring droughts, crop failures, and water shortages.
Second, the review underscores the profound influence of narratives. Media representation, civic activism, and public discourse collectively shape societal perceptions of the climate crisis and influence the prioritization of solutions. Narratives emphasizing technological advancement or economic growth frequently sideline the voices of vulnerable communities. In contrast, justice-oriented narratives foreground equity, inclusion, and human rights. Grassroots movements and Indigenous advocacy illustrate how alternative framings can redirect political agendas toward sustainability and fairness.
Third, many contemporary climate policies lack an explicit equity lens. Instruments such as carbon pricing, emissions trading systems, and stringent environmental regulations may inadvertently impose regressive burdens—particularly on low-income households that allocate a larger portion of their income to energy and essential goods. Conversely, equity-driven approaches—such as just transition frameworks, targeted renewable energy subsidies, and participatory adaptation planning—can simultaneously reduce disparities and advance mitigation goals. The notion of a “just transition” is especially critical: it seeks to ensure that the shift to low-carbon economies does not exacerbate unemployment, displacement, or regional inequality, but instead fosters inclusive development.
Fourth, environmental narratives reveal that geographically sensitive regions—including coastal zones, small islands, arid landscapes, and mountainous communities—face disproportionate risks. Rising sea levels threaten the viability of island nations, while intensifying droughts destabilize food systems in semi-arid areas. These impacts often trigger migration, heighten intergroup tensions, and strain fragile social structures. Importantly, intersecting vulnerabilities—across gender, class, race, and geography—compound these risks. Women and children, for example, are particularly disadvantaged due to gendered labor roles, restricted resource access, and elevated health risks.
Fifth, adaptive policymaking and inclusive governance are essential. Case studies demonstrate that resilience is strengthened when adaptation strategies are rooted in local knowledge, inclusive participation, and community empowerment. Effective interventions often involve enhancing local health and education systems, improving disaster preparedness, investing in renewable energy infrastructure in underserved areas, and fostering multi-level collaboration among governments, civil society, and international institutions.
 
Conclusion
Climate change intensifies social and economic inequalities by disproportionately affecting low-income and vulnerable groups with limited adaptive capacity. The framing of climate change in social and media narratives plays a key role in shaping public awareness, policy responses, and justice-oriented action. To avoid reinforcing inequalities, climate policies must incorporate distributive justice, inclusive participation, just transition strategies, adaptive measures, renewable energy development, and targeted support. International cooperation is also essential, particularly to strengthen the capacities of developing countries. Achieving sustainable development under climate change ultimately requires a comprehensive and justice-centered approach.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Climate Change
  • Social Inequality
  • Climate Justice
  • Media Narratives
  • Environmental Policy
[1] Legg S. IPCC, 2021: Climate change 2021-the physical science basis. Interaction. 2021; 49(4): 44-45.
[2] Timmons Roberts J, Parks BC. Fueling injustice: globalization, ecologically unequal exchange and climate change. Globalizations. 2007 Jun; 4(2): 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747730701345218.
[3] Schlosberg D. Theorising environmental justice: the expanding sphere of a discourse. Environmental Politics. 2013 Feb; 22(1): 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.755387.
[4] Markkanen S, Anger-Kraavi A. Social impacts of climate change mitigation policies and their implications for inequality. Climate Policy. 2019 Apr; 19(7): 827-844. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1596873.
[5] Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM. Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum. 2007 Nov; 38(6): 1190–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.008.
[6] Nikolic A-M. Global progress report on sustainable development goal 16 indicators: A wake-up call for action on peace, justice and inclusion. Drepturile Omului. 2023; 86.
[7] Newell P, Mulvaney D. The political economy of the ‘just transition’. Geographical Journal. 2013 Jun; 179(2): 132–140. https://doi:10.1111/geoj.12008.
[8] Levy BS, Patz JA. Climate change, human rights, and social justice. Annals of Global Health. 2015 Jun; 81(3): 310–322. https://doi:10.1016/j.aogh.2015.08.008.
[9] Robbins P. Political ecology: A critical introduction. 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2019. https://doi:10.1002/9781119167457.
[10] Massey DS. Categorically unequal: The American stratification system. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2007.
[11] Folke C. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change. 2006 Aug; 16(3): 253–267. https://doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002.
[12] Baker JL. Climate change, disaster risk, and the urban poor: cities building resilience for a changing world [Internet]. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications; 2012. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/644301468338976600.
[13] Alston M. Gender mainstreaming and climate change. Women’s Studies International Forum. 2014; 47(Part B): 287–294. https://doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2013.01.016.
[14] Whyte K. Indigenous climate change studies: Indigenizing futures, decolonizing the Anthropocene. English Language Notes. 2017; 55(1–2): 153–162. https://doi:10.1215/00138282-55.1-2.153.
[15] Nurse LA, McLean RF, Agard J, Briguglio LP, Duvat-Magnan V, Pelesikoti N, Tompkins E, Webb A. Small islands. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, editors. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. p. 1613–1654. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WGIIAR5-Chap29_FINAL.pdf
[16] Dong Z, Xiao Y. Carbon emissions trading policy and climate injustice: A study on economic distributional impacts. Energy. 2024; 296: 131074. https://doi:10.1016/j.energy.2024.131074.
[17] Bäckstrand K, Kuyper JW. The democratic legitimacy of orchestration: the UNFCCC, non-state actors, and transnational climate governance. Environmental Politics. 2017 May; 26(4): 764–788. https://doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1323579.
[18] Nisbet MC. Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 2009 Aug; 51(2): 12–23. https://doi:10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23.
[19] Boykoff MT. Who speaks for the climate? Making sense of media reporting on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. https://doi:10.1017/CBO9780511978586.
[20] McAdam J. Swimming against the tide: Why a climate change displacement treaty is not the answer. In: Kneebone S, Stevens D, editors. Refugees and Rights. London: Routledge; 2017. p. 379–404.
[21] Fisher DR, Nasrin S. Climate activism and its effects. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change. 2021 Jan-Feb; 12(1): e683. https://doi:10.1002/wcc.683.
[22] Islam N, Winkel J. Climate change and social inequality. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs; 2017. DESA Working Paper No. 152. https://doi:10.18356/2c62335d-en.
[23] Filonchyk M, Peterson MP, Zhang L, Hurynovich V, He Y. Greenhouse gases emissions and global climate change: Examining the influence of CO₂, CH₄, and N₂O. Science of The Total Environment. 2024 Jul; 935: 173359. https://doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173359.
[24] Elkins P, Baker T. Carbon taxes and carbon emissions trading. Journal of Economic Surveys. 2001 Jul; 15(3): 325–376. https://doi:10.1111/1467-6419.00142.
[25] Ogunrinde O, Shittu E, Dhanda KK. Investing in renewable energy: Reconciling regional policy with renewable energy growth. IEEE Engineering Management Review. 2018 Nov; 46(4):103–111. https://doi:10.1109/EMR.2018.2880445.
[26] Yamin F, Rahman A, Huq S. Vulnerability, adaptation and climate disasters: a conceptual overview. IDS Bull. 2005; 36(4): 1–14. https://doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2005.tb00231.x.
[27] Muller M. Adapting to climate change: water management for urban resilience. Environment and Urbanization. 2007 Apr; 19(1): 99–113. https://doi:10.1177/0956247807076726.
[28] Hossain B. A systematic review of adaptation practices to promote health resilience in response to climate change. Environmental Development. 2025 Jun; 101166. https://doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101166.
[29] Yadav S. Empowering communities for climate resilience: Bridging knowledge and action to combat climate change. In: Roy PK, Hamidi MB, Abd Wahab H, editors. Community Climate Justice and Sustainable Development. Hershey, PA: IGI Global Scientific Publishing; 2025. p. 83–104. https://doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0619-3.ch005.
[30] Heffron RJ. Achieving a just transition to a low-carbon economy. Cham: Springer; 2021. https://doi:10.1007/978-3-030-89460-3.
[31] Ngcamu BS. Climate change effects on vulnerable populations in the Global South: a systematic review. Natural Hazards. 2023 Jul; 118(2): 977–991. https://doi:10.1007/s11069-023-06145-5.
[32] Kikstra JS, Nicholls ZR, Smith CJ, Lewis J, Lamboll RD, Byers E, et al. The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report WGIII climate assessment of mitigation pathways: from emissions to global temperatures. Geoscientific Model Development. 2022 Dec; 15(24): 9075–9109. https://doi:10.5194/gmd-15-9075-2022.
[33] Beck U. Remapping social inequalities in an age of climate change: for a cosmopolitan renewal of sociology. Global Networks. 2010 Mar; 10(2): 165–181. https://doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2010.00281.x.
[34] Heyen DA. Social justice in the context of climate policy: Systematizing the variety of inequality dimensions, social impacts, and justice principles. Climate Policy. 2023 Nov; 23(5): 539–554. https://doi:10.1080/14693062.2023.2205701.
[35] Buthelezi N, Matamanda A, Nel V. Climate change adaptation policies and disparities in informal urban settlements. In: Filho WL, Luetz JM, Ayal DY, editors. Handbook on Planning and Climate Change Adaptation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2025. p. 158–181. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22081242.
[36] Adger WN, Huq S, Brown K, Conway D, Hulme M. Adaptation to climate change in the developing world. Progress in Development Studies. 2003; 3(3): 179–195. https://doi:10.1191/1464993403ps060oa.
[37] Kaklauskaite U, Streimikiene D. Climate justice from the lens of sustainable development. Sustainable Development. 2024 Dec; 32(6): 6788–6800. https://doi:10.1002/sd.2673.
 
 
دوره 1، شماره 4
دی 1404
صفحه 1-12
  • تاریخ دریافت: 16 شهریور 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 30 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 04 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 04 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار: 05 دی 1404