ارزیابی مدل‌های مبتنی‌بر درخت تصمیم غیرپارامتریک برای پیش‌بینی عمق آبشستگی پایه‌های پل

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مهندسی عمران، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه آیت‌الله العظمی بروجردی (ره)، بروجرد، ایران.

2 دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد، گروه مهندسی عمران، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه آیت‌الله العظمی بروجردی (ره)، بروجرد، ایران.

چکیده

ماهیت پیچیده آبشستگی پایه پل و تأثیرات پارامترهای مختلف در برآورد آن ضرورت استفاده از یک مدل غیرخطی و جامع را بیش‌تر نمایان می‌سازد. در پژوهش حاضر از چهار مدل مبتنی‌بر درخت تصمیم و هم‌چنین از آمار پل‌های مختلف بهره‌گیری می‌شود. اطلاعات مورداستفاده در این پژوهش برای مدل‌سازی درخت‌های تصمیم‌گیری شامل سرعت جریان در بالادست، قطر متوسط ذرات بستر، عمق جریان در بالادست پایه و عرض پایه، زاویه هجوم آب به پایه، طول پایه، قطر ذراتی که 84 درصد از آنها از قطر آن کوچک‌تر هستند، ضریب شکل پایه، به‌عنوان متغیرهای ورودی و عمق آبشستگی موضعی به‌عنوان خروجی در مدل می‌باشد. در این پژوهش از روش‌های جدید درخت تصمیم برای محاسبه و مقایسه عمق آبشستگی پایه پل استفاده می‌شود. نتایج نشان می‌دهند که مدل تقویت گرادیان شدید (XGB) و جنگل تصادفی (RF) با ضریب تبیین 0.76 و 0.73 دارای دقت بیش‌تری نسبت به چهار مدل بررسی‌شده بودند و مدل تقویت گرادیان (GB) در رده بعد از این دو مدل با ضریب تبیین 0.67 قرار دارد و مدل درخت تصمیم (DT) در رده آخر قرار دارد. هم‌چنین با تحلیل حساسیت صورت‌گرفته بر روی مدل‌ها مشاهده شد که عرض پایه و هم‌چنین طول پایه بیش‌ترین تأثیر را بر روی عمق آبشستگی دارند. پس از این دو پارامتر عمق جریان در بالادست بیش‌ترین تأثیر را بر روی عمق آبشستگی دارد.  

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Nonparametric Decision Tree Models for Predicting Scour Depth of Bridges

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mehdi Komasi 1
  • Rezvan Dalvand 2
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ayatollah Boroujerdi University, Boroujerd, Iran.
2 Master's graduate, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ayatollah Boroujerd University, Boroujerd, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract
Objective: The complex nature of bridge pier scour and the influence of various parameters on its estimation highlight the necessity of using a comprehensive nonlinear model. In the present study, four decision-tree-based models along with data from different bridges are employed.
Method: The input variables used for modeling the decision trees include upstream flow velocity, median bed particle diameter, upstream flow depth at the pier, pier width, angle of attack of the flow to the pier, pier length, particle diameter for which 84% of the particles are finer, and the pier shape factor, while the output variable is the local scour depth. In this study, modern decision tree methods are applied to calculate and compare bridge pier scour depth.
Results: The results indicate that the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) and Random Forest (RF) models, with coefficients of determination of 0.76 and 0.73, respectively, exhibit higher accuracy compared to the four investigated models. The Gradient Boosting (GB) model ranks next with a coefficient of determination of 0.67, while the Decision Tree (DT) model shows the lowest performance.
Conclusion: Sensitivity analysis performed on the models reveals that pier width and pier length have the greatest influence on scour depth. After these two parameters, upstream flow depth has the most significant effect on scour depth.
 
 
 
English Extended Abstract
Introduction
Water distribution networks represent a critical component of urban infrastructure, ensuring the delivery of safe water at adequate pressure. Rapid urbanization and aging pipelines have increasingly led to failures, pressure deficits, leakage, and reduced network reliability, highlighting the need for efficient design and rehabilitation strategies.
The design problem is inherently multi-objective, requiring a balance between minimizing construction costs and maintaining sufficient hydraulic performance. Traditional design approaches are largely heuristic and unable to guarantee near-optimal solutions, whereas evolutionary algorithms have shown superior performance in complex optimization tasks. However, many of these algorithms suffer from drawbacks such as premature convergence, instability, or sensitivity to parameter tuning.
The Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer (MOGWO), inspired by cooperative hunting behavior, has emerged as a robust alternative due to its effective balance between global exploration and local exploitation. This study proposes a novel MOGWO-based framework that minimizes network cost while maximizing resilience, and evaluates its effectiveness on the real-world D-zone distribution network in Mashhad.
 
Method
The present study uses four decision tree-based models and data (and information) from multiple bridges. The information used in this study to model the decision trees include the upstream flow velocity, average bed particle diameter, upstream flow depth and base width, angle of water intrusion into the base, base length, and diameter of particles of which 84% are smaller than its diameter, base shape factor, as input variables and local scour depth as output in the model.
In this study, new decision tree methods are used to calculate and compare the bridge base scour depth. In this study, data from the US Federal Highway Administration was used to build models and validate decision trees. It was extracted from statistics on several bridges in the US. All information was collected in the field and included information related to the depth of scour around bridge piers in different locations.
 
Results
The results show that the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) and Random Forest (RF) models with coefficients of determination of 0.76 and 0.73 had higher accuracy than the four models examined, and the Gradient Boosting (GB) model was in the second place after these two models with coefficients of determination of 0.67, and the Decision Tree (DT) model was in the last place. Also, with the sensitivity analysis performed on the models, it was observed that the base width and the base length have the greatest effect on the scour depth. After these two parameters, the upstream flow depth has the greatest effect on the scour depth.
 
Conclusion
Bridge foundation scour is one of the most important issues in bridge safety. Considering the importance of this issue, in the present study, an attempt has been made to use new decision tree-based models to evaluate this issue. Decision tree methods are one of the best evaluation methods due to their simple understanding and ability to work with large and complex data. In future study, it is possible to combine new decision tree-based methods with other data mining or machine learning methods.
The results show that the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) and the Random Forest (RF) models had higher accuracy than the four models examined, and the Gradient Boosting (GB) model and the Decision Tree (DT) model were in last place. Also, with the sensitivity analysis performed on the models, it was observed that the base width and the base length have the greatest effect on the scour depth. After these two parameters, the upstream flow depth has the greatest effect on the scour depth.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Scour
  • Decision Tree
  • Gradient Boosting
  • Random Forest
  • Extreme Gradient Boosting
[1] Azad M, Mashkov M. Multi-stage optimization of decision and inhibitory trees for decision tables with many-valued decisions. European Journal of Operational Research. 2017 Dec 16; 263(3): 910-921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.026.
[2] Lim S, Cheng N. Prediction of live-bed scour at bridge abutments. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 1998 Jun 1; 124(6): 635-638. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:6(635).
[3] Melville B, Sutherland AJ. Design method for local scour at bridge piers. Journal of Hydraulic Division. 1988 Oct 1; 114(10). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1988)114:10(1210).
[4] Mia MF, Nago H. Design method of time-dependent local scour at circular bridge pier. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 2003 May 15; 129(6): 420-427. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:6(420).
[5] Arneson L, Zevenbergen L, Lagasse F, Clopper F. Evaluating Scour at Bridges. Federal Highway Administration Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 18: Federal Highway Administration Publication No. FHWA-HIF-12-003 HEC-18.2012. 340 p.
[6] Shariati H, Khodashenas SR, Esmaili K. Effect of collar shape on the local scouring around the bridge piers, Journal of Hydraulics. 2010 Feb; 4(4): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.30482/jhyd.2010.85424 [In Persian].
[7] Karimi N, Heidarnejad M, Masjedi A. Scour depth at inclined bridge piers along a straight path: A laboratory study. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal. 2017 Aug; 20(4): 1302-1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2017.07.004.
[8] Yao S, Kronenburg A, Shamooni A, Stein OT, Zhang W. Gradient boosted decision trees for combustion chemistry integration. Applications in Energy and Combustion Science. 2022 Sep; 11, 100077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaecs.2022.100077. 
[9] Sulaimanpour S, Mesbah S, Hedayati B. Application of K-Means and CART data mining algorithms in determining the most effective factors of drinking water quality in Noorabad Plain, Fars Province. 11th National Seminar on Watershed Management. Yasouj. University of Yasouj. 2016 Apr 19 [In Persian].
[10] Grömping U. Variable importance assessment in regression: Linear regression versus random forest. The American Statistician. 2009 Jan 01; 63(4): 308-319. https://doi.org/10.1198/tast.2009.08199.
[11] Carmona P, Climent F, Momparler A. Predicting failure in the US banking sector: An extreme gradient boosting approach. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2019 May; 61: 304-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2018.03.008.
[12] Chen T, Guestrin C. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. KDD '16: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2016 Jan 01; pp. 785-794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785.
[13] Adnane M, El M, El Fkihi S, Haj Thami RO. Prediction demand for classified ads using machine learning: An experiment study. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Networking, Information systems & security. 2019 Mar 27; 39: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3320326.332037.
[14] An Y, Zhou H. Short-term effect evaluation model of rural energy construction revitalization based on ID3 decision tree algorithm. Energy Reports. 2020 Jul; 8(4): 1004-1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.239.
[15] Mueller DS, Wanger CR. Field Observations and Evaluations of Streambed Scour at Bridges. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Admin. Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, McLean, Va 22101-2296. 2005 May.
[17] Tsai, Ch-F, Chiou Y-J. Earnings management prediction: A pilot study of combining neural networks and decision trees. Expert Systems with Applications. 2009 Apr; 36(3): 7183-7191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.09.025.
[18] Dilmi S. A combined water quality classification model based on kernel principal component analysis and machine learning techniques. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2022 Dec; 279: 61-67. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2022.29069.
[19] Zahiri J. Riprap Design for Bridge Piers Using Nonparametric Models. Water and Soil Science. 2016 Mar; 5(4): 187-199 [In Persian].
[20] Hastie T. The elements of statistical learning, Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Second Edition. New York: Springer; 2009 Aug. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7.
[21] Yao S, Kronenburg A, Shamooni A, Stein OT, Zhang W. Gradient boosted decision trees for combustion chemistry integration. Applications in Energy and Combustion Science. 2022 Sep; 11, 100077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaecs.2022.100077.
[22] Mia MF, Nago H. Design method of time-dependent local scour at circular bridge pier. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 2003 May 15; 129(6): 420-427. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:6(420).
 
دوره 1، شماره 1
فروردین 1404
صفحه 39-48
  • تاریخ دریافت: 04 مهر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 30 آذر 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 19 دی 1403
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 19 دی 1403
  • تاریخ انتشار: 05 فروردین 1404